Remote monitoring and follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in the Netherlands: An expert consensus report of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology

Remote monitoring of cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED: pacemaker, cardiac resynchronisation therapy device and implantable cardioverter defibrillator) has been developed for technical control and follow-up using transtelephonic data transmission. In addition, automatic or patient-triggered alerts are sent to the cardiologist or allied professional who can respond if necessary with various interventions. The advantage of remote monitoring appears obvious in impending CIED failures and suspected symptoms but is less likely in routine follow-up of CIED. For this follow-up the indications, quality of care, cost-effectiveneness and patient satisfaction have to be determined before remote CIED monitoring can be applied in daily practice. Nevertheless remote CIED monitoring is expanding rapidly in the Netherlands without professional agreements about methodology, responsibilities of all the parties involved and that of the device patient, and reimbursement. The purpose of this consensus document on remote CIED monitoring and follow-up is to lay the base for a nationwide, uniform implementation in the Netherlands. This report describes the technical communication, current indications, benefits and limitations of remote CIED monitoring and follow-up, the role of the patient and device manufacturer, and costs and reimbursement. The view of cardiology experts and of other disciplines in conjunction with literature was incorporated in a preliminary series of recommendations. In addition, an overview of the questions related to remote CIED monitoring that need to be answered is given. This consensus document can be used for future guidelines for the Dutch profession

Cardiac resynchronization therapy; the importance of evaluating cardiac metabolism

Cardiac Dysfunction and Arrhythmia

Evidence of scar tissue: contra-indication to cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Ventricular Dysfunction & Heart Failur

VDDR pacing after His-bundle ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A pilot study

His-bundle ablation followed by pacemaker implantation is today a widely accepted therapeutic choice when drug refractoriness of symptomatic AF is evident. The selection of pacing mode in patients suffering from paroxysmal AF is still controversial. Preservation of AV synchrony is an attractive option in patients with paroxysmal AF who undergo His-bundle ablation. The purpose of this study was to examine prospectively the contribution of VDDR pacing for preservation of AV synchrony. After His-bundle ablation a VDDR pacing system was implanted in 17 patients with paroxysmal AF and all antiarrhythmic drugs were withdrawn. The endpoint of the study was defined as the onset of chronic AF, To document the onset of chronic AF 48-hour Holter recordings were made every 6-8 weeks. After a mean followup of 18.2 (range 14-21) months, VDDR pacing is still operative in 13 patients (77%). Four patients developed chronic AF after a mean follow-up of 6 months. Of several baseline characteristics, only the intraatrial P wave at implantation was significantly smaller in patients developing chronic AF than in patients in whom the VDDR mode is still operative. This pilot study suggests that VDDR pacing is an attractive pacing method for patients with paroxysmal AF after His-bundle ablation. A low intraatrial P wave electrogram at implant was associated with a higher risk for the development of chronic AF